Message-ID: <20010210154816.710.qmail@lauras.lt> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:48:16 +0200 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Cygnus tree in SFN, again Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com References: <20010210115707 DOT 1224 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: ; from tim.van.holder@pandora.be on Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 03:22:55PM +0100 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > a) If there are 8.3 conflicts (ie foobar123.c and > foobar123-xyzzy.c both exist), you should submit a > patch to the maintainers to get this fixed. Even if > it won't get accepted, you need to make sure they > know about the problem. The odds are they would laugh at me. Also some 8.3 names are very ugly. > b) Can't you use fnchange.lst to use 'NUL' as new name > for the conflicting files? That would send them to > the bit bucket, wouldn't it? I suppose you'd still > be stuck with the directories, but that's probably > not that bad. This is not as bad, but I'm stuck with several hundred files here. So probably I'm writing a script to deal with them. Laurynas