Message-ID: <20010210154039.559.qmail@lauras.lt>
From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:40:39 +0200
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygnus tree in SFN, again
Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <20010210115707 DOT 1224 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <1659-Sat10Feb2001154958+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To: <1659-Sat10Feb2001154958+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 03:49:59PM +0200
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 03:49:59PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> No :-(.  Ideally, djtar should be able to do that if the name-change
> file has only one file name (the original one) on the line, exactly
> like it does interactively, but it doesn't support this currently.

...and as you've correctly pointed out below, we are stuck
with current djtar capabilities.

> Moreover, I'd advise against omitting entire directories.  

Actually I don't care if those directories are in or out, but currently
I can't run the unpacker non-interactively, that's the problem.

> ``Laziness is the mother of invention'' (a paraphrase, I know ;-).  So
> how about writing a short program to automatically transform the
> clashing names?

Hm... Probably I will. And put on my TODO - 'improve djtar'. Such field
testing points out very good where djtar could be improved.

Laurynas