Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 12:26:22 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-Id: <3028-Fri09Feb2001122621+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3A83DDDB.27937.17876C@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject: Re: GCC: DJGPP bootstrap fix + define MSDOS
References: <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10102090913070 DOT 95006-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv>	(message from Andris Pavenis on Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:27:12 +0200 (WET)) <3A83DDDB DOT 27937 DOT 17876C AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:08:59 +0200
> 
> The situation is different with gcc-3.0: as far as I understood gcc-2.97
> currently cannot be bootstrapped for DJGPP if  -mbnu210 is not 
> removed.

I'm confused: I thought you suggested to make it the default as the
solution for gcc-3.0.

> Maybe it's possible to still provide these options simply for 
> compatibility for some time without actually using them

That is certainly a good idea.  I think we should try not to break
existing packages.