Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:06:46 -0500
Message-Id: <200102081906.OAA12046@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <7458-Thu08Feb2001203557+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Subject: Re: stddef.h - namespace std patch
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010208161840 DOT 23371B-100000 AT is> <200102081545 DOT KAA10438 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7458-Thu08Feb2001203557+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Right.  So we should only worry about old GCC versions installed on
> users' machines, if they upgrade djdev without upgrading GCC.

Right.

> Is it reasonable to tell that we recommend GCC 2.9x or later for
> djdev204?

Yes, I think that's reasonable, as long as it's as good as the older
versions.