Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:08:53 -0500
Message-Id: <200102071908.OAA32045@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <002701c09131$61f2c8e0$9c11893e@oemcomputer>
	(djgpp AT argentum DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk)
Subject: Re: wctype.h and STLport
References:  <002701c09131$61f2c8e0$9c11893e AT oemcomputer>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Is there any objection to declaring these functions, even though
> DJGPP doesn't yet implement them?

I'd rather not declare things we don't have.  If you want to
*implement* them, go ahead, but let's not lie about what we have.  It
will only cause link errors later.