Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:58:16 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" <markus DOT oberhumer AT jk DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at>
Message-Id: <3405-Wed31Jan2001175815+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <XFMail.20010131154432.markus.oberhumer@jk.uni-linz.ac.at>
Subject: Re: Binary rubbish
References:  <XFMail DOT 20010131154432 DOT markus DOT oberhumer AT jk DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:44:32 +0100 (CET)
> From: "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" <markus DOT oberhumer AT jk DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at>
> 
> Rubbish ???
> 
> Well, not sure what's happened to djgpp-workers, but
> sorry for bothering you.

Please don't get offended, Markus.  I'm sure Martin didn't mean that.
When people talk in what isn't their first language, we cannot be too
picky about the exact words they choose to express what they want to
say.

The upshot of what started with that r-word is that if you can avoid
sending sources as binary attachments, many people here will be very
happy.

FWIW, I've saved your code and will review it in due time.  I hope you
will want to hear the comments, mine or anyone else's.

Thanks!