From: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <200101311114.MAA06869@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: Binary rubbish
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:14:03 +0100 (MET)
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP-WORKERS)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010131130548.1051B-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Jan 31, 2001 01:07:53 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > If people want feedback, they should make it easy to provide it.
> 
> Agreed.  But I still am not sure this justifies draconian measures
> such as filtering out attachments or bouncing the messages back to
> their senders.  Most people will comply if you ask nicely.

Yes, they do. I _am_ grateful for that.  But I'm getting mightily
tired of needing to remind people of that. As soon we have a new
contributor we have this exchange...


Right,

						MartinS