From: Martin Stromberg Message-Id: <200101311027.LAA06798@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> Subject: Re: Binary rubbish To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:27:43 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <20010131100400.12798.qmail@lauras.lt> from "Laurynas Biveinis" at Jan 31, 2001 12:04:00 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > But that ``binary rubish'' is a standard way to attach files > to emails. Maybe there is a newer ELM version than that one > you're using? I don't know, however if it existed it wouldn't be any good: I obviously want to comment on some of the text; why should I need to cut and paste from that other window/whatever? If the original poster put it in the message body, I'd have all the text at my hands to edit as I see fit. If people want feedback, they should make it easy to provide it. Right, MartinS