X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:44:45 -0600
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djasm patch #4 (enums)
Message-ID: <20010130104445.A29151@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <20010128092849 DOT B27091 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <7458-Sun28Jan2001203011+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20010130094057 DOT A29026 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <200101301625 DOT LAA21618 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200101301625.LAA21618@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 11:25:32AM -0500
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: This change seems unrelated to the others:

Oops, I neglected to hack that bit out.

Bill has this to say about it:

	this patch is really separate from the enums patch. I probably
	committed it at the same time, though :)

	Its purpose is to allow you to allocate space using .union
	instead of .struct when using a union. As there is no checking,
	.struct and .union are interchangable (I couldn't think of an
	easy way to implement the checking).

If everything else is okay, though, I could check in this bit as
a separate patch with a separate log message.