From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200101281535.QAA17405@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: djasm patch #3
In-Reply-To: <20010128092238.A27091@kendall.sfbr.org> from JT Williams at "Jan 28, 2001 09:22:38 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:35:43 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to JT Williams:
> -: Otherwise, it's okay.
> 
> Could the second entry be extended to explain Bill's
> cryptic (to me) remark:
> 
> ``Urk, just for the killing of the magic number,
> Martin's code is the one to go with.''

I think he means I changed 28 to a #define. I don't think that
information belongs in wc204.txi.


Right,

						MartinS