Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 12:19:06 -0700
From: Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Cc: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
Subject: Re: djasm patch
Message-ID: <20010126121906.A9266@taniwha.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
References: <20010125161754 DOT A22046 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <200101260746 DOT IAA04919 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <20010126082741 DOT A22475 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <6137-Fri26Jan2001202056+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <6137-Fri26Jan2001202056+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:20:57PM +0200
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:20:57PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what do you mean by ``backwards in
> time'' here.

Jeff means that I didn't keep MY djasm.y up to date with the official version
and thus many bug-fixes in djasm are not in my version. He thinks this is one
of those (which you just proved).

Bill
-- 
Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak