Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:25:43 -0500
Message-Id: <200101261425.JAA05782@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.0.20010125210306.03b51020@pop5.banet.net>
	(pjfarley AT banet DOT net)
Subject: Re: Where does gcc -o foo make foo.exe
References: <3A605A7C DOT 44 DOT 7AB95C AT localhost>
 <3A687DD7 DOT 834 DOT 3F21A6 AT localhost> <5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20010125210306 DOT 03b51020 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> PMFJI here, but as far as I know, there is no reason not to commit the 
> fcntl patches.  I have seen no test failure reports from anyone, and at 
> least one successful report that the patches worked as advertised.

OK, then, unless there are any compelling reasons to not check them
in, go ahead and check them in.  We'll deal with new problems later.

If any of these need legal papers, make sure you get them to me.

> To summarize what's left to commit, and the order in which they should 
> be committed:
> 
> Mark E.'s "getdinfo" patches --> 
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2000/06/18/17:15:33
> 
> dostrerr patch #3 --> 
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2000/12/29/06:58:48
> 
> fcntl main patch #3b --> 
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2001/01/05/22:47:19
> 
> flock/[l]lockf patch #3 --> 
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2000/12/31/14:41:45