Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010125210306.03b51020@pop5.banet.net>
X-Sender: usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 21:18:08 -0500
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
From: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
Subject: Re: Where does gcc -o foo make foo.exe
Cc: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <3A6D9470.4200.42F8E2@localhost>
References: <3A605A7C DOT 44 DOT 7AB95C AT localhost>
 <3A687DD7 DOT 834 DOT 3F21A6 AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

At 02:25 PM 1/23/01 -0500, Mark E. wrote:
<Snipped>
 >Also, the fcntl patch adds lfilelength which my fill function uses. I 

 >believe that patch is close to being done, correct?

PMFJI here, but as far as I know, there is no reason not to commit the 
fcntl patches.  I have seen no test failure reports from anyone, and at 
least one successful report that the patches worked as advertised.

To summarize what's left to commit, and the order in which they should 
be committed:

Mark E.'s "getdinfo" patches --> 
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2000/06/18/17:15:33

dostrerr patch #3 --> 
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2000/12/29/06:58:48

fcntl main patch #3b --> 
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2001/01/05/22:47:19

flock/[l]lockf patch #3 --> 
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2000/12/31/14:41:45

---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR
                      pjfarley AT banet DOT net)