X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:05:36 -0600
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Adding MWDPMI sources to CVS
Message-ID: <20010125090536.B19492@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 30 DOT 0101251122250 DOT 10291-100000 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.30.0101251122250.10291-100000@sirppi.helsinki.fi>; from peuha@cc.helsinki.fi on Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:35:19AM +0200
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: I asked DJ about making MWDPMI sources available via CVS, and he
-: replied that he would prefer adding them to a new directory in the
-: existing DJGPP source tree.  Is it acceptable to name that directory
-: src/mwdpmi?

What are the reasons for organizing mwdpmi differently than cwsdpmi?