Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:07:18 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: RE: Interaction between __dpmi_yield and signals?
In-Reply-To: <NEBBIOJNGMKPNOBKHCGHCEPOCAAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010123120653.9288B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Tim Van Holder wrote:

> Thanks, but I think I'll leave well enough alone; it works for now.

Works--how?  By disabling __dpmi_int inside `relinquish'?  That's not
nice on Windows: the program will hog the CPU.