Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 18:59:13 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: "Alain Magloire" Message-Id: <2593-Sun21Jan2001185912+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <200101211609.LAA27011@qnx.com> (alain@qnx.com) Subject: Re: Status update (Smalltalk/Python) References: <200101211609 DOT LAA27011 AT qnx DOT com> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 11:09:16 -0500 (EST) > From: "Alain Magloire" > > > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Tim Van Holder wrote: > > > > Wasn't sure what to use for a value though; would apps expect > > > > crypt()'ed values or plaintext? > > > > > > Could people who can access Unix and GNU/Linux boxes please look what > > > they do? > > Crypt. I think emulating encrypted password is way too much. Would some application mind if we return a clear-text password? Would they even know?