From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200101182036.VAA24158@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: Fw: Patch for statfs.c
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010118100629.3768C-100000@is> from Eli Zaretskii at "Jan 18, 2001 10:07:08 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:36:25 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> No one said that the Linux counts are the correct ones.  The CDs in
> question are probably with Joliet extensions, which might make them
> appear slightly differently to different OSes, because each filesystem
> sees a somewhat different picture.

Possible. Linux detects Joliet extensions, though:

Jan 18 21:33:25 kant kernel: Max size:70652   Log zone size:2048
Jan 18 21:33:25 kant kernel: First datazone:25   Root inode number 51200
Jan 18 21:33:25 kant kernel: ISO9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 1

But we don't know if those are part of the Linux count anyway (unless
somebody examines the source - not me, right now).


Right,

						MartinS