Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:07:08 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
cc: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Fw: Patch for statfs.c
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010117211305.03654860@pop5.banet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010118100629.3768C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Peter J. Farley III wrote:

> I think this is beginning to establish that my system is somehow 
> different or buggy.

It indeed looks like some of the system calls work differently on your
system.  Nothing new, of course, with all the `DLL he**'' going on out
there.  (Did you ever look what the System File Checker reports on
your system about replaced DLLs?)

> Especially since Linux and Unix report a third count, different from
> either of the others.

No one said that the Linux counts are the correct ones.  The CDs in
question are probably with Joliet extensions, which might make them
appear slightly differently to different OSes, because each filesystem
sees a somewhat different picture.