X-Authentication-Warning: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de: broeker owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:23:03 +0100 (MET)
From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
X-Sender: broeker AT acp3bf
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djasm documentation patch 2/4
In-Reply-To: <3099-Sat13Jan2001195335+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101151620370.13182-100000@acp3bf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > What's missing from `djasm'?
> 
> IMHO these gotchas are not grave enough to label the assembler
> ``limited''.
> 
> How about "DJGPP-specific assembler" instead?

Or how about "special-purpose"? Or, maybe even closer to the point,
"limited-purpose", as that's the real distinction between DJASM and other
assemblers: it's not (meant to be) a general-purpose assembler, and the
"What's missing" section already cited in this thread even explicitly says
so.

-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.