Message-ID: <20010113170528.12043.qmail@lauras.lt>
From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 19:05:28 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Where does gcc -o foo make foo.exe
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <20010112223359 DOT 497 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <20010113131222 DOT 221 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To: <20010113131222.221.qmail@lauras.lt>; from lauras@softhome.net on Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 03:12:22PM +0200
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 03:12:22PM +0200, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> I've incorrectly described the problem. The real
> problem is that if one says 'gcc foo.c -o foo', then
> only foo.exe is made, and no foo. This breaks autoconf
> etc and needs fixing.

Now I've tracked it down to bug in compiler driver. I've fixed it
in 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-01/msg1085.html

Laurynas