Message-ID: <20010113090951.1222.qmail@lauras.lt>
From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 11:09:51 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Where does gcc -o foo make foo.exe
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <20010112223359 DOT 497 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <200101122255 DOT RAA15943 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To: <200101122255.RAA15943@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:55:30PM -0500
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:55:30PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> You need the latest linker too.  The stub format is the default output
> format for the linker.  This was done back when bfd learned how to
> read stubbed exes (objdump, nm, etc).

Yes, I've the latest linker. The problem depends solely on
GCC version, everything else being the same.

Laurynas