Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17:02:55 -0500
Message-Id: <200101122202.RAA15516@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <20010112143602.B6051@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT Williams
	on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:36:02 -0600)
Subject: Re: djasm documentation patch 2/4
References:  <20010112143602 DOT B6051 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> + * djasm::       The DJGPP 16-bit assembler (limited functionality).

*I* wouldn't say it was "limited".

> + 
> + @c -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + @node djasm, , update, Top
> + @include djasm.txi

Would it be better to put the @node inside djasm.txi?  I can see
benefits for doing it either way.