Message-ID: <20010111094405.2985.qmail@lauras.lt> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:44:05 +0200 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: possible bootstrap fix Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com References: <3A5A63B5 DOT 20609 DOT 8652F1 AT localhost>; <20010109142714 DOT 226 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <3A5CA4FB DOT 12401 DOT D51689 AT localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A5CA4FB.12401.D51689@localhost>; from snowball3@bigfoot.com on Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 06:07:55PM -0500 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 06:07:55PM -0500, Mark E. wrote: > > 2) Top priority: xvalloc: currently it wastes twice the > > allocated memory. This means windows users can use only > > 32MB for GCC. Not too good, to say the least. > > Now this part of your note puzzles me. I now have 192M of memory, and the > go32-v2 under Win98 DOS VM reports the same as usable. But if user (like me) has 64MB or less, then DOS box will see only 64MB, no matter how much swap space he has. Laurynas