Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:45:31 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz AT is To: "Peter J. Farley III" cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Martin Str|mberg , ceo AT nbensacomputers DOT com Subject: Re: Fw: Patch for statfs.c In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010109194232.0274eec0@pop5.banet.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Peter J. Farley III wrote: > >Does the version in fil316s.zip differ from what's in stock v2.03 > >libc? If so, it's possible that you are right (I didn't build the > >current fil316b.zip on SimTel, so I don't know for sure). > > Yes, but only in seemingly minor ways. Here are the two versions: > > N:\>dir o:\gnu\filutil3.16\djgpp\statfs.c > > Directory of O:\gnu\filutil3.16\djgpp > > STATFS C 4,707 03-29-97 11:48a statfs.c > 1 file(s) 4,707 bytes > 0 dir(s) 633,094,144 bytes free > > N:\>dir statfs.c > > Directory of N:\ > > STATFS C 4,797 08-04-99 3:58p statfs.c > 1 file(s) 4,797 bytes > 0 dir(s) 1,290,010,624 bytes free > > Here is the diff command I ised to see what was different: > > N:\>diff -u o:/gnu/filutil3.16/djgpp/statfs.c statfs.c>statfs97.dif > > And here is the result of the diff: These diffs are indeed insignificant. > Agreed, that seems to be the only way. The problem is, I can't get any > of the versions I've tried so far to give the results that df from > fil316b.zip gives. I will try building fil316s.zip with the stock > v2.03 libc.a and see what results I get from that. Yes, this seems like a good idea.