Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:02:58 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Fw: Patch for statfs.c
In-Reply-To: <200101082112.WAA00328@father.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010109100143.19017C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> Soooo, suppose if we take the (non-block) sizes from INT21 AX=7303 and
> the block size from INT2f AX=1510 and then scales the other values
> accordingly so in sum it's right (in accordance with WINDOZE).

I'd agree to that, but I'd like first to see what do other, more
reliable OSes report for DVDs and CDs, and also understand the strange
discrepancy between `df' from fil316b.zip and the version produced by 
compiling fil316s.zip.