Message-ID: <002501c0796b$9b50cfc0$d90d893e@oemcomputer>
From: "Stephen Silver" <djgpp AT argentum DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: namespace std
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 12:07:41 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Martin Stromberg wrote:

> Eli said:
> > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Stephen Silver wrote:
> > 
> > > Note that the same temporary macro can (and almost certainly should) be
> > > used for each <c*> header.  (Question: What naming convention is used for
> > > DJGPP macros?  Is __dj_no_hoist_ acceptable?  Or __dj_via_cplusplus_header_?
> > 
> > I think both are acceptable, but perhaps others think otherwise.
>
> I think __dj_via_cplusplus_header_ is much better because I understand
> what it means.

OK, I'll use __dj_via_cplusplus_header_ (unless there are objections).

> What does hoist in this context mean?

See my reply to Eli.

Stephen