Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 13:45:12 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Message-Id: <3028-Sat06Jan2001134512+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3A55C132.12287.6F26E9@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com)
Subject: Re: valloc and memalign draft
References:  <3A55C132 DOT 12287 DOT 6F26E9 AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:42:26 -0500
> 
> This is a draft of valloc (and memalign) designed to used mainly by the GCC's 
> garbage collection routines. I designed it to be memory efficient and return 
> a pointer that can safely be passed to free(). While a generic valloc is in 
> the works for inclusion in libiberty, it's always better to have our own 
> version if possible.

Shouldn't align_val and split_alloc be declared static?