Message-ID: <3A5374B5.6DE1CE8@softhome.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 20:51:33 +0200
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Stability of new long arg passing code?
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010103164122 DOT 3654C-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Now I see that various programs involved in compilation
> > complain about options which they shouldn't get at all, like '-c' for cc1.exe,
> > '-W' for ld.exe and so on. So this is a GCC bug.
> 
> The question now is whether this is in GCC's application code or
> something in dosexec which gets linked into GCC.

I've added some debugging output and now I can tell that args 
are passed and received indeed correctly. I've not found the
cause of this bug yet, but it's genuine GCC bug.

Laurynas