Message-ID: <3A532029.B50F24B1@softhome.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 13:50:49 +0100
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Stability of new long arg passing code?
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010103133043 DOT 2342C-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Weird.
> 
> Is there any repeatable pattern in which options are reported as
> unrecognized?  E.g., is cc1.exe always the one which complains?  

No, sometimes ld.exe complains too. So it says that there is 
a bug in compiler driver, the gcc.exe. Because my ld.exe is
compiled before CMDLINE changes.

> Are the
> options it complains about the same options, or do they repeat
> themselves?  

It complains randomly, with no visible order.

> Do these options indeed belong to the program which
> complains, or, perhaps, cc1 gets options that belong to gcc?

A good question. Now I see that various programs involved in compilation
complain about options which they shouldn't get at all, like '-c' for cc1.exe,
'-W' for ld.exe and so on. So this is a GCC bug.

Thanks for help,
Laurynas