Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 13:33:44 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Stability of new long arg passing code?
In-Reply-To: <3A531017.CA005BC5@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010103133043.2342C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> > What do you have for a shell when you see these problems?
> 
> Anything. bash 2.04, command.com from win98se, all kinds of file managers...

Weird.

Is there any repeatable pattern in which options are reported as 
unrecognized?  E.g., is cc1.exe always the one which complains?  Are the 
options it complains about the same options, or do they repeat 
themselves?  Do these options indeed belong to the program which 
complains, or, perhaps, cc1 gets options that belong to gcc?