Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:10:01 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
cc: DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Bug000323 and _open()
In-Reply-To: <200101030649.HAA01437@father.ludd.luth.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010103110912.1129W-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> Should _open(), _creat() and _creatnew() support the O_APPEND mode?

IMHO, no.  These are direct interfaces to system calls, so they should 
only support bits which are directly passed to the DOS call.