Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3A52596F.BE0AEB1@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 22:42:55 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.17 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patch #4 for dtou and utod
References: <B0FEA00E82A7D1118BFB00A0CC99027846327A AT argon DOT smr DOT nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Michel de Ruiter wrote:
> 
> > * choose a name for the directory (suggestions?)
> 
> dtoutod, or utodtou? :-)

Ugh, I'm getting a headache from double vision. I agree with DJ - why do
we need another directory for these programs?

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe
[ mailto:richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com | http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ ]