Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 16:42:08 -0500
Message-Id: <200101022142.QAA11774@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101022228330.2775-100000@acp3bf> (message from
	Hans-Bernhard Broeker on Tue, 2 Jan 2001 22:32:06 +0100 (MET))
Subject: Re: config/mh-djgpp in Cygnus tree
References:  <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10101022228330 DOT 2775-100000 AT acp3bf>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> It may *look* like one, but it may just as well be an essential
> piece to the DJGPP port of the program that just didn't get
> commented understandibly. IIRC, you can not build GCC with -g
> active.  At least at the time of DJGPP 1.x, when DJ says this change
> was conceived, that was the case. You would hit the hard limit of
> 64K symbols in a COFF object file, otherwise. A debuggable GCC needs
> '-gstabs', instead.

Doh!  I knew there was something about that...

Well, I took it out.  If anyone wants to submit a version with a
better comment, I'll humbly put it back in.

Of course, it would be better if we supported more than 64k symbols.
Maybe this will encourage us to find a workable solution to that.