From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: Two glitches for autoconf 2.49b
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 21:27:34 +0100
Message-ID: <NEBBIOJNGMKPNOBKHCGHMEEDCAAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <200101021925.UAA28994@father.ludd.luth.se>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id PAA12593
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Would it be similarly easy to change man to support the mapping "::"
> -> "/"? The reason I ask is because perl modules which contain "::" is
> mapped to "/". E. g. the perl module Math::Bigfloat.pm is stored in
> Math/Bigfloat.pm and you say you're going to use it with the perl code
> "use Math::Bigfloat;". So there is already a mapping "::" -> "/" used
> in perl.
Exctly. So having, say, a $DJDIR/share/perl5/man directory, with the man
files in subdirectories would mirror the layout of the
$DJDIR/lib/perl5/ directory. And since the files wouldn't be in the main
man directory, preserving the usual man directory structure is not that
big of an issue.