Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 21:09:27 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: pjfarley AT banet DOT net Message-Id: <1190-Tue02Jan2001210927+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 CC: tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.0.20010102112624.0274c260@pop5.banet.net> (pjfarley AT banet DOT net) Subject: Re: Two glitches for autoconf 2.49b References: <9003-Mon01Jan2001185653+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20010102112624 DOT 0274c260 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 11:50:25 -0500 > From: "Peter J. Farley III" > > It would not be hard to change the name to use directories (in fact, > that part is trivial), but the name would then have to be parsed to > find out what new directories to create and to create them before > writing the man file. The real problem with this is that it breaks the standard man directory hierarchy. > In summary, it may well be that there will *never* be an 8.3-safe build > available for perl on DJGPP. In which case, the "::" ==> "__" choice I > made is the simplest solution (though changing it to a single "_" would > probably be accepted without any complaints). I'd still like to know what does the Windows port of Perl do with these names. Can someone find out? > Eli, would it be too intrusive to add a "special case" to the man clone > to check for "::" in the requested page name and automagically convert > it to "__"? It's not hard. `man' already does some extra-special hacks to support 8+3 filesystem seamlessly (did you ask yourself what happens when you type "man install-info" on DOS? wildcard expansion doesn't truncate the name to 8+3, you know, so how does `man' find `install-.1'?..)