From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200101021646.RAA28521@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: FAT32's extend flag remove for OS/2
In-Reply-To: <7458-Tue02Jan2001183133+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from Eli Zaretskii at "Jan 2, 2001 06:31:33 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 17:46:29 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> > Why are we calling _get_dos_version(0) in _creat_n.c and not
> > _get_dos_version(1)?
> 
> I don't know; I didn't write that code ;-).
> 
> In general, you can use _get_dos_version(0) when you don't care if
> some software, such as SETVER, lies to you about the DOS version.
> 
> Also note that if _get_dos_version(0) is good enough, you can simply
> use _osmajor and _osminor.

Isn't it better to use _get_dos_version(1) in the case in question,
then?


Right,

						MartinS