Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 20:37:56 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: JT Williams Message-Id: <2427-Mon01Jan2001203755+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <20010101115634.A1819@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT Williams on Mon, 1 Jan 2001 11:56:34 -0600) Subject: Re: Patch #4 for dtou and utod References: <39A514185 AT HRZ1 DOT hrz DOT tu-darmstadt DOT de> <20010101115634 DOT A1819 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 11:56:34 -0600 > From: JT Williams > > As the utilities `djtar' and `utod/dtou' have taken on a life of their > own, may I suggest that the organization of src/utils be revised? Since > `djtar' lives in its own directory, can we arrange the same for dtou/utod? > > * choose a name for the directory (suggestions?) and move utod/dtou > sources there. Add a makefile (use the makefile from djtar/ as a > template?) > > * edit src/utils/makefile to recurse into the new directory and build > utod and dtou > > * move documentation for djtar from src/utils/utils.txi to > src/utils/djtar/djtar.txi > > * move documentation for dtou and utod from /src/utils/utils.txi > to src/utils/*/dtou.txi and utod.txi. > > * some changes (minor, I hope) will be needed (but where?) to reflect > the new locations for the texinfo sources and make sure it all gets > pulled together. All this--what for? Is the current setup somehow incorrect or inconvenient? The separate directories are created for programs which take several source files. utod and dtou are still a single file each. Not that I object if someone wants to make it happen, but I think we have more important things to invest efforts.