Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 20:34:54 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <1659-Mon01Jan2001203454+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200101011809.TAA23636@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Mon, 1 Jan 2001 19:09:43 +0100 (MET))
Subject: Re: DOZE and WINDOZE versions
References:  <200101011809 DOT TAA23636 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 19:09:43 +0100 (MET)
> 
> According to Eli Zaretskii:
> > > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> > > Then we could have a completely DJGPP-hosted build environment.
> > 
> > You lost me.  How does this pertain to NT versonities?
> 
> I think he means: if we had this cross-compiler we could build this
> WINDOZE program/extension/whatever in DOZE.

??? If you use MinGW to produce a DJGPP program, that program cannot
access any Windows-specific API, exactly like a natively-compiled
DJGPP program.  Am I missing something?