Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 18:56:53 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: "Tim Van Holder" Message-Id: <9003-Mon01Jan2001185653+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: Subject: Re: Two glitches for autoconf 2.49b References: Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: "Tim Van Holder" > Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 16:36:59 +0100 > > I tried config.foo. No luck. It will find config.guess.1 in man/cat1, but > it claims it's the page for 'config' in section 'guess.1' if man -l is used. You are right: it finds config.guess if you say "man config", but not if you say "man config.guess". > Oh, and while we're on the topic of man pages, how would you treat > Perl's man pages (eg Foo::Bar.3). These are extremely invalid names > on dos. What? Perl finally got man pages?? It doesn't use *.pod files anymore??? Blasphemy! ;-) > I'd suggest that man changes '::' in a man page to a '/', so > the man pages can be in subdirs (eg man/cat3/Foo/Bar.3). I don't think `man' should dictate to the ported Perl how to rename these files in the DJGPP port. How are these files called in the distributions of DOS and Windows ports (`:' is invalid on Windows as well)?