From: Martin Str|mberg Message-Id: <200101010828.JAA21780@father.ludd.luth.se> Subject: Re: Fw: Patch for statfs.c In-Reply-To: from Norberto Alfredo Bensa at "Jan 1, 2001 04:57:48 am" To: ceo AT nbensacomputers DOT com (Norberto Alfredo Bensa) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:28:29 +0100 (MET) Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP-WORKERS) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk According to Norberto Alfredo Bensa: > From: "Martin Str|mberg" > > As a matter of fact with your work we get up to ~4GiB on networks > > drives in WINDOZE too. Great work! > > L00k, df compiled with cvs version: > > > > WINDOZE.4 1 520576 468752 51824 90% c:/ > > SWAP 521368 315136 206232 60% d:/ > > Drive E: 717968 227872 490096 32% e:/ > > APPS 5960700 4509468 1451232 76% f:/ > > GAMES 4723280 3934256 789024 83% g:/ > > \\SERVER\MIRROR 2097120 2047680 49440 98% m:/ > > MS-RAMDRIVE 16360 8 16352 0% t:/ > > \\SERVER\MARTIN 2097120 0 2097120 0% u:/ > > > > With your version: > > Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on > > WINDOZE.4 1 520572 468748 51824 90% c:/ > > SWAP 521368 315136 206232 60% d:/ > > Drive E: 717968 227872 490096 32% e:/ > > APPS 5960696 4509448 1451248 76% f:/ > > GAMES 4723276 3934248 789028 83% g:/ > > \\SERVER\MIRROR 4128705 4079628 49077 99% m:/ > > MS-RAMDRIVE 16360 8 16352 0% t:/ > > \\SERVER\MARTIN 4128705 0 4128705 0% u:/ > > > > Are those network drives shared over TCP/IP and running under Win9x with > FAT32 support? hmmm... I guess you're running df from DOS as you have a > ramdisk... Nope. WINDOZE 98 (not SECOND EDITION) in #ordinary mode" if there such a thing. TCP/IP of course, they are samba drives... > I'm using TCP/IP under Win98, one drive is ~16GB, the other one is ~8GB and > reporting here is not limited to ~4GB... the output from df: > > % df --human-readable > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > WINDOWS.98 16G 10G 5.3G 66% c:/ > SWAP 345M 100M 245M 29% d:/ > WINDOWS95 604M 604M 0 100% e:/ > \\K6300\C 7.7G 6.5G 1.2G 85% f:/ > \\P5233\C 202M 160M 42M 79% g:/ Hohum... That's interesting. My m: drive is ~6.8GiB and my u: drive is ~9.4GiB. What is the server running? Mine is running Linux 2.0.something and samba 1.9.something. > > So I'll check in your patch in a couple of days if nobody objects. > > > > It would be good to get this tested on DOZE 6.21 and earlier and DOZE > > 7.0 and WINDOZE before FAT32 arrived to see we don't mess up anything. > > I've tested on DOS 7.0 and Windows 95 (the very first version) and it seams > to work ok, unfortunately limited to ~2GB... I guess that services 217303 and > 217302 were not implemented on that version. Yeah. That's ok. We do our best, don't we? > BTW, I've could not compile fileutils 3.16 with libc from CVS. I sitll don't > know why, but compilation crash and it does really bad, in fact, my system > resets!... The problem seams to be on: ln -s [source] [dest]. Does anybody > have some similar problem? Yes I think I run into the same problems with ln. A patch was posted. Search the mail archives. I don't remember when, sorry! (Although I never quite understood why ln went beserk.) Full of figs, wine and New Model Army, MartinS