From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200012311446.PAA18462@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: DOZE and WINDOZE versions
In-Reply-To: <9003-Sun31Dec2000100508+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from Eli Zaretskii at "Dec 31, 2000 10:05:09 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:46:04 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> I thought Windows 98 was supposed to report 7.20, at least in some of
> its releases, no?  We have a couple of functions, like _rename and
> mkdir, which depend on that: they call special functions of Int 21h
> that support path names up to 128 characters.

Perhaps that is the SECOND EDITION?

> Also, if you have access to Windows ME, could you see what goes wrong
> with _rename on that OS?  We had in the past a few reports about
> linking which fails with EINVAL due to that.

I've tried running "mv a b" with success. Doesn't mv use rename()?


Right,

						MartinS