Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 12:50:55 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Message-Id: <5137-Sun31Dec2000125055+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3A4E089C.A7FFDA87@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Sat, 30 Dec 2000 17:09:00 +0100)
Subject: Re: config/mh-djgpp in Cygnus tree
References:  <3A4E089C DOT A7FFDA87 AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 17:09:00 +0100
> From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> 
> I see following in GCC and GDB (and probably others)
> in file config/mh-djgpp:
> 
> # We don't want to use debugging information on DOS.  Unfortunately,
> # this requires that we set CFLAGS.
> # This used to set -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
> CFLAGS=-O2

This is harmless, at least in the GDB case: the top-level Makefile
sets CFLAGS to "-O2 -g".  Isn't this the same in GCC?

> It is not clear from this comment why we don't want to use
> debugging info on DOS. Or is this obsolete and we can remove
> it safely?

What do you want to remove?  If it's the comment, you obviously can do
that.  But I won't recommend removing the CFLAGS=-O2 line: ``if it
ain't broke, don't fix it''.