Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:05:09 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <9003-Sun31Dec2000100508+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200012302341.AAA15758@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Sun, 31 Dec 2000 00:41:31 +0100 (MET))
Subject: Re: DOZE and WINDOZE versions
References:  <200012302341 DOT AAA15758 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 00:41:31 +0100 (MET)
> 
> FYI, I've checked what versions are reported on some platforms:
> 
> Where "ver" reports "Windows 95. [Version 4.00.1111]"
> _get_dos_version() reports 7.10.
> 
> Where "ver" reports "Windows 98 [Version 4.10.1998]"
> _get_dos_version() reports 7.10.
> 
> Where "ver" reports "Windows Millennium [Version 4.90.3000]"
> _get_dos_version() reports 8.0.

Thanks for the info.

I thought Windows 98 was supposed to report 7.20, at least in some of
its releases, no?  We have a couple of functions, like _rename and
mkdir, which depend on that: they call special functions of Int 21h
that support path names up to 128 characters.

Also, if you have access to Windows ME, could you see what goes wrong
with _rename on that OS?  We had in the past a few reports about
linking which fails with EINVAL due to that.