From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200012282313.AAA06788@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: Start to section for KB on how to contribute to DJGPP
In-Reply-To: <3A4BA452.BB6ADC3F@bigfoot.com> from Richard Dawe at "Dec 28, 2000 08:36:34 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 00:13:13 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Richard Dawe:
> Hello.
> 
> Please find below a start to section for the knowledge base on how to
> contribute to DJGPP, collated from various e-mails. There's a lot of room
> for improvement:

Wonderful!!!

> + @subsection libc/stubs.h
> + @cindex libc/stubs.h
> + 
> + The @strong{only} time you put something in @file{stubs.h} is if an
> + ANSI/POSIX function in libc needs to call a non-ANSI/POSIX function
> + in libc, in which case the non-ANSI/POSIX function needs to be listed
> + in @file{stubs.h}. (or, for ansi functions calling POSIX-only
                   ^^^
> functions).

Isn't there a "." too much here?

> + @item
> + Don't use capital letters for emphasis - use @samp{@@strong@{@}}
> instead.

Hmm... Wasn't there something about "-" in texinfo. Like it's written
like "---" or "@{something}.


I have another item (perhaps):

"@item
For some texinfo technique that is relevant look at the source of this
page.  "


Right,

						MartinS