From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: diff -u
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:25:32 +0100
Message-ID: <NEBBIOJNGMKPNOBKHCGHGEBICAAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-reply-to: <200012271600.RAA00710@father.ludd.luth.se>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id LAA13651
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Is it possible to change the recommendation when generating patches to
> "use -u"? The -c diffs is very hard for me (humans?) to decypher.
This seems to be purely a personal preference. I for one find context diffs
easier to read than unified ones. But then again, I'm not human :-P
Generally speaking, I'm happy as long as it isn't the useless standard
format.