Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:45:44 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.* for DJGPP
In-Reply-To: <3A3D1EAB.6EEADF2F@softhome.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001218094517.15310F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Could someone please look into this and see why doesn't libio compile
> > cleanly?  I'm worried that more of such problems will creep into
> > libstdc++ if we don't fix them and send patches to maintainers.
> 
> IMHO we should at first check if this is still applicable to libstdc++-v3.

Yes, of course.  I thought it was in libstdc++-v3 as well.