Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 18:59:23 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: lauras AT softhome DOT net Message-Id: <9628-Fri15Dec2000185922+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3A3A4179.2DBE8489@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis on Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:06:17 +0100) Subject: Re: GCC 2.95.2.1 References: <200012142231 DOT RAA24859 AT indy DOT delorie DOT com> <3A39AC60 DOT F81F7193 AT softhome DOT net> <1659-Fri15Dec2000122719+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3A3A0AFD DOT F042D0A0 AT softhome DOT net> <1190-Fri15Dec2000141859+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3A3A4179 DOT 2DBE8489 AT softhome DOT net> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:06:17 +0100 > From: Laurynas Biveinis > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Perhaps someone needs to tell the GCC > > maintainers about the problem with the main ste. > > IIRC, they have set low (20?) limit of simultaneous downloads on purpose. No, that's not the problem. I did succeed to enter the site, but the FTP client said that the server marked these files undownlodable (or something to that effect).