Message-ID: <3A3A4179.2DBE8489@softhome.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:06:17 +0100
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GCC 2.95.2.1
References: <200012142231 DOT RAA24859 AT indy DOT delorie DOT com> <3A39AC60 DOT F81F7193 AT softhome DOT net> <1659-Fri15Dec2000122719+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3A3A0AFD DOT F042D0A0 AT softhome DOT net> <1190-Fri15Dec2000141859+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Perhaps someone needs to tell the GCC
> maintainers about the problem with the main ste.

IIRC, they have set low (20?) limit of simultaneous downloads on purpose.

> Thanks, but I refuse to put something other than an official release
> on a CD-ROM which is supposed to be used by non-GCC-hackers, as long
> as my name is on that CD-ROM.  The only exception to this rule is when
> I know that the unofficial release is in extensive use by many people
> for quite some time.

Sure, it's up to you.

Laurynas