Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 13:53:55 +0200 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GCC 2.95.2.1
In-Reply-To: <200012142231.RAA24859@indy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10012151347080.40950-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> I'm told that GCC 2.95.2.1 is released.  Does anyone know if the
> changes are important for DJGPP?
> 
> I'm asking because I'm putting final touches on the GNU
> MS-DOS/MS-Windows CD-ROM, and I need to decide whether it is worth the
> hassle to replace v2.95.2 with this new version.
> 

I don't know.

Current gcc-2.95.3 tree does not build for me (cc1obj crashes
when building libobjc) both under Linux (tested more recently)
and also under DJGPP (tested previous week). gcc-2.95.2.1 have much
less changes than gcc-2.95.3 prerelease in CVS. So maybe it will be
worth to try. Anyway I should wait before it will appear on ftp.gnu.org
and perhaps when I'll return home (after about a week)
but perhaps after Cristmass (if this is acceptable)

Andris