X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:38:53 -0600
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: MS-DOS path support in CVS
Message-ID: <20001214133853.A18318@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001214115151 DOT 25353P-100000 AT is> <NBBBIOJKJBNCHJBEKHLOMEFCCCAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <NBBBIOJKJBNCHJBEKHLOMEFCCCAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>; from tim.van.holder@pandora.be on Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 07:07:43PM +0100
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: Yes, but the CVS maintainers seem disinclined to accept DOS-specific
-: patches anyway - they only accept stuff that is related to CVS on
-: the platforms on which they use it. DOS isn't one of them.

This is depressing.  Has cvs diverged so much since Erik van Linstee's
DOS port of cvs 1.3 that his changes can't be retrofitted into current
CVS code?